Lead Docket pricing vs CasePeer and Lawmatics: what personal injury intake software costs

Of the six personal injury lead intake platforms we priced on 1 September 2026, exactly one publishes a dollar figure. CasePeer prints $79, $119 and $149 per user per month. Lead Docket, its parent Filevine, Lawmatics, Litify and Jove, the platform that used to be called GrowPath, all answer the pricing question with a demo form. The practical consequence is that you cannot shortlist this category on a spreadsheet: five of six vendors require a sales call before you learn whether they are even in your range. The number worth carrying into those calls is $119 per user per month, because that is what CasePeer charges for the cheapest plan that actually includes client intake management.

Last updated September 2026. Every figure below was read directly from each vendor's own pricing page on 1 September 2026.

What each vendor actually publishes

We read all six pricing pages the same day rather than pulling numbers from review directories, and that distinction matters more here than in most categories. The directories listing prices for these platforms are largely repeating figures that traced back to vendor blog posts years ago and were never withdrawn when the vendor stopped publishing.

Captorra returned an HTTP 403 to us and could not be verified either way, so it is excluded from the count rather than guessed at. The full breakdown of what Lead Docket pricing consists of, and what Filevine builds a custom quote from, is on its own page.

CasePeer is the only anchor available, and its headline price is not the real one

CasePeer publishes under a heading that says simple, transparent pricing, and it earns that. Three plans, three figures, stated twice on the page so there is no ambiguity, plus a full side by side feature matrix.

The catch is in the gating, and it is the sort of thing that costs a firm a full evaluation cycle if it is missed. Basic at $79 per user per month is case management: contacts and matters, task management, a client portal, automated statute alerts, settlement negotiations, medical treatment tracking, case expense tracking, client trust tracking and calendaring. Client intake management is not on it. Intake appears on Pro at $119, together with unlimited two way texting, case stage management screens, over fifty additional reports and legal AI writing assistance. Advanced at $149 adds text scheduling, data sync for reporting, a multi office reporting suite, an intake investigator portal, case grades and API access.

So a firm buying this software to run intake is looking at $119 per user per month, not $79. That is a 51 percent gap between the number on the marketing page and the number that applies. On a ten person intake team it is $1,190 a month rather than $790, and if you need API access to wire intake into anything else, another tier up puts you at $1,490. E-signature is an add on at every tier, not included in any of them.

Lawmatics publishes everything except the price

Lawmatics goes further than anyone else in the group without ever landing on a number. It names three tiers, Essential, Premium and Enterprise, and publishes a genuinely detailed feature matrix underneath them. Every price position on all three reads Get a demo or Contact Sales.

It does tell you the metering unit, which is more than Lead Docket or Litify manage. Lawmatics meters on CRM contacts rather than on users: 500 contacts on Essential and 10,000 on Premium, with an asterisk noting that additional contacts are sold separately. Both published tiers carry a three user minimum. Essential caps client intake automations at ten and e-signatures at fifty, and offers basic conflict checking; Premium makes automations unlimited and upgrades conflict checking to advanced. So the smallest possible Lawmatics purchase is three seats and 500 contacts, and you cannot price either of them.

There is one detail on that page that says more about this market than any analysis could. The only dollar amount anywhere on the Lawmatics pricing page is a $50 gift card the company offers you in exchange for taking a demo. A vendor will print a number to get you onto a sales call and decline to print one to tell you what the software costs.

Jove, formerly GrowPath, publishes a model instead of a number

If you are working from a comparison written before this year, GrowPath is now Jove. The pricing page at the old domain is titled Pricing - Jove and the product is referred to as Jove throughout, down to feature names like Jove Document Storage.

Jove does not publish a figure either, but it does something none of the others do: it publishes the shape of the deal. The first year is free apart from implementation. Implementation is a single fixed fee. There are no per user fees. Pricing is based on firm complexity rather than headcount. You still cannot compute your bill, but you can tell immediately whether the structure suits a firm that is about to hire five intake staff, and that is a real question a per user card answers badly. It is also a reasonable standard to hold the other five to: if one vendor in the category will state its implementation posture in public, the rest can state theirs on a call.

Which one should a personal injury firm actually buy

These are not interchangeable products, and treating them as one shortlist is the most common mistake we see in this category.

CasePeer and Litify are case management systems with intake attached. Lead Docket is the opposite: it is a lead intake and marketing attribution product that sits in front of a case system rather than replacing one, which is why firms commonly run it alongside Filevine. Lawmatics is a legal CRM and marketing automation platform, strongest on the drip campaigns and nurture sequences that convert a lead who was not ready in week one. Jove is a full platform aimed at firms that want to consolidate.

The useful sorting question is what your bottleneck actually is. If leads arrive and go cold because nobody follows up fast enough, you have a speed to lead problem and a CRM or intake layer fixes it. If leads convert fine but you cannot tell which advertising produced them, you have an attribution problem, and Lead Docket's marketing reporting is genuinely strong there: you enter your spend and it reports revenue by source, conversion rates and wanted leads against it. Before you buy a platform to answer that question, it is worth spending an afternoon looking at which ads your competitors are currently running, because in personal injury the answer often reframes what you are trying to measure. If your problem is that cases stall after signing, none of this helps and you are shopping for case management.

How to get a comparable number out of a quote-only vendor

When five of six vendors will not publish, the pricing work moves onto you. A short discipline makes those calls produce something you can actually compare.

• Force the unit before the amount. Per user, per lead, per matter, per location, or a platform fee plus usage. A number without a unit cannot be compared to anything, including the CasePeer card.
• Get quoted at 1.5x and 2x your size. Intake teams grow fastest when marketing works. Ask whether the rate per unit improves or stays flat, and get it in writing.
• Ask for a written cap on the renewal increase. Quote-only vendors often price year one to win and year two to earn, through an uncapped uplift on a multi year term.
• Price implementation and data migration separately. In this category those are routinely a four or five figure line that never appears in the monthly number.
• Confirm what leaving costs. Your leads, intake form responses and attribution history are the record of which marketing worked. Ask whether you can export them, in what format, and for what fee.

Does any personal injury intake software publish a price?

One does. CasePeer publishes $79, $119 and $149 per user per month, and it is the only vendor of the six whose pricing page carries a figure at all. Lead Docket, Filevine, Lawmatics, Litify and Jove all require a demo request. If you need a budget number before you can get internal approval to evaluate, CasePeer is the only vendor in this category that will give you one without a sales call.

Why is Lead Docket pricing not published?

Filevine builds each Lead Docket quote around the firm rather than a plan, and the commercial logic is legitimate even if it is inconvenient. A personal injury firm spending fifty thousand dollars a month on advertising and one spending two thousand are not buying the same product, whatever the feature list says, and a published rate would anchor the larger deals downward. What it costs you as a buyer is not money but time: you cannot budget, you cannot shortlist, and you learn a vendor is out of range on a call rather than in five seconds on a page. Budget an extra evaluation cycle for every quote-only vendor on your list, and read our wider breakdown of legal software pricing for how the rest of the market behaves. If you are weighing the platform itself rather than its price, we keep a separate Lead Docket alternative comparison, and a broader look at how much legal intake software costs across the category.